GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about wiki until somebody posts a number — 27 comments in the full submission. View in context.
300
c/meta·submitted 4 months ago by u/enzo_petrescu

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about wiki until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 11 comments

wiki. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/newbiequestions is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort wiki out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 15 months. My ApoB…

Read the full submission and all 27 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 4 months ago
u/marta_dziedzic30 points·4 months ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/rulebook_rachaelMOD22 points·4 months ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram_only15 points·4 months ago

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink
u/discount_math_dm12 points·4 months ago

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts0 points·4 months ago

Strongly agree.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 30 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_frisk15 points·4 months ago

rule-change proposals need concrete wording

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_demir0 points·4 months ago

the evidence standards are rules

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_wikstrom1 point·4 months ago

the evidence standards are rules

Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.