[Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on non-peptide
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: small molecule matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 10 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 5 people measuring the…
What was the batch number and which service?
oral non-peptide agonist is ACHIEVE, no food restrictions
availability speculation must be flaired Speculation
How many weeks between the two measurements?
the muscle cramps profile is speculative at this stage
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 15. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
Stalled for 21 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 62.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
the supply conversation changes if this approves
ATTAIN and ACHIEVE are phase 16 trials
ATTAIN and ACHIEVE are phase 16 trials
Adding to this: non-peptide is doing more work than the comment implies.