oral GLP-1 is the most under-discussed thing in c/darkspot
ACHIEVE. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/survodutide is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort ACHIEVE out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 5 months. My ApoB was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
Strongly agree. The supply impact would be huge.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
oral non-peptide agonist is small molecule, no food restrictions
[removed by moderator]
Strongly agree. The supply impact would be huge.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
the supply conversation changes if this approves
the supply conversation changes if this approves
Adding to this: oral GLP-1 is doing more work than the comment implies.
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides
- 1My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off…7 comments in this branch · started by u/aksel_kjaer