what would you tell week-1 you about non-peptide
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: small molecule matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 16 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 9 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
ATTAIN and ACHIEVE are phase 21 trials
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
phase 5 data is interesting, phase 16 will tell the real story
This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 23.
availability speculation must be flaired Speculation
cite ATTAIN/ACHIEVE arms specifically
availability speculation must be flaired Speculation
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.
- 1ATTAIN and ACHIEVE are phase 21 trials7 comments in this branch · started by u/brigade_detector