[Question] how do you actually verify TRIUMPH
Right, the triple agonist question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 14 data points over 8 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 62, not week 16. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Removed a chain here.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
- 1research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols5 comments in this branch · started by u/ismael_eriksen