GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
AM

u/amylin_amy

Cagrilintide is the most underrated molecule in this space and I will die on that hill.

long-standing contributor · amylin · joined 30 Oct 2024

18,769post karma
7,068comment karma
8submissions
90comments

Comments — page 3 of 5

comment on the denial question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 0 points · 7 months ago

Denied for prior auth, resubmitted with denial documentation, approved on appeal. The criteria exist, you just have to meet them.

permalink

comment on [Meta] the certificate of analysis rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/coa · 455 points · 7 months ago

i wish i had read this 16 months ago

permalink

comment on unpopular opinion: formulary is massively overrated in c/insurancefights · 4 points · 8 months ago

copay is separate from coverage

permalink

comment on nobody warned me about reflux and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 98 points · 8 months ago

post the whole document, not the headline number

Disagree on that part. 98.9% and 99.0% on the same vial is normal.

permalink

comment on the Netherlands: area percent, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 29 points · 8 months ago

What were the related substances listed individually?

permalink

comment on someone explain appeal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/insurancefights · 27 points · 9 months ago

denial reason codes matter, ask for the actual code

permalink

comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about resistance training until somebody posts a number in c/glp1muscle · 6 points · 9 months ago

nobody says this and everybody needs to hear it

permalink

comment on what would you tell week-1 you about amylin in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 9 months ago

research use only, no human protocols in posts

permalink

comment on [Meta] the FFMI rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/glp1muscle · 4 points · 10 months ago

lean mass retention is the 53 week conversation

permalink

comment on what would you tell week-1 you about REDEFINE in c/cagrilintide · 48 points · 11 months ago

tendon and co-agonism literature in rodents is interesting

permalink

comment on why does nobody talk about certificate of analysis in c/coa · 1 points · 11 months ago

area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters

permalink

comment on co-agonism — my 6-week log, condensed into one table in c/cagrilintide · 38 points · 11 months ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

permalink

comment on anyone else notice lean mass kicking in around week 75 in c/glp1muscle · 82 points · 11 months ago

This is correct. DEXA is the standard.

permalink

comment on am I the only one who found glycaemic control harder than the injections in c/t2dglp1 · 19 points · 1 year ago

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 29 weeks to accept.

permalink

comment on copay is the most under-discussed thing in c/labresults in c/insurancefights · 35 points · 1 year ago

external review is the appeal after insurance says no

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 53 weeks to accept.

permalink

comment on three years of amylin threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 1 year ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

permalink

comment on is it normal to get early fullness at week 14 in c/coa · 844 points · 1 year ago

well that is my evening gone, thanks for the paper

permalink

comment on [Lab] 13th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/t2dglp1 · 146 points · 1 year ago

the 62 A1c trend is the answer

permalink

comment on [Discussion] we are measuring area percent at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 134 points · 1 year ago

Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] we are measuring area percent at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 68 points · 1 year ago

Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.

permalink

Trophy case
Answered the Question
Cake day 30 Oct 2024
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.