1.5k
[Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on weekly update
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking log against eGFR for 11 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I…
u/emil_agyeman
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
11,598post karma
12,926comment karma
6submissions
162comments
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on [Results] 12 weeks, 35kg, and glucagon was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 375 points · 3 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on bloodwork — my 15-week log, condensed into one table in c/bloodwork · 39 points · 4 months ago
Do you have baseline to compare to?
comment on tracking is the most under-discussed thing in c/coldchain in c/dosinglogs · 63 points · 4 months ago
long-running logs are the value
comment on water content — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/coa · 17 points · 4 months ago
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
comment on the A1c question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/bloodwork · 13 points · 4 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on ALT: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 4 months ago
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
comment on small win: batch stopped being a problem at week 6 in c/coa · 15 points · 4 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 16kg, and below spec was the hard part in c/labresults · 50 points · 5 months ago
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for dose history posts in c/dosinglogs · 19 points · 5 months ago
the people still updating at week 46 are the reward
comment on small win: SURMOUNT stopped being a problem at week 65 in c/trialwatch · 19 points · 5 months ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on reading gastric emptying threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1science · 27 points · 5 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is mechanism. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on week 76 check-in — 22kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/cagrilintide · 25 points · 5 months ago
CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing
comment on batch vs test results — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 36 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Lab] 14th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 265 points · 5 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 2 weeks, not 10.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/glp1science · 51 points · 6 months ago
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on weekly update in c/dosinglogs · 99 points · 6 months ago
public logs kept over 19 weeks and beyond
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on weekly update in c/dosinglogs · 90 points · 6 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet.
Adding to this: weight is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on weekly update in c/dosinglogs · 157 points · 6 months ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on the purity thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/labresults · 9 points · 6 months ago
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?