u/lina_falk
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Uppsala.
member · joined 10 Jan 2025
comment on [Vendor] MKM communication is slow but the material has been fine in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 1 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising.
Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim in c/vendorvetting · 22 points · 1 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on order records in c/vendorvetting · 21 points · 2 months ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on reading bloodwork threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 2 months ago
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 42 weeks to accept.
comment on vendor vs testing — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 38 points · 2 months ago
First order from ERP was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
comment on switched from 15mg to 12.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 74 points · 2 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on switched from 15mg to 12.5mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/vendorvetting · 335 points · 2 months ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for reship posts in c/vendorvetting · 11 points · 3 months ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on order records — 15 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 169 points · 3 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Janoshik at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · -37 points · 4 months ago
Homopeptide order #2, Poland, no drama, receipts inside
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 16kg, and A1c was the hard part in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, baseline matters more than any later number.
comment on the VendorInvestigate thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 7 months ago
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
comment on testing — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 59 points · 8 months ago
okay but what dose
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 38 weeks to accept.
comment on does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/vendorvetting · 2 points · 8 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on [PSA] order records is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 12 points · 10 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.
comment on ApoB is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1science in c/bloodwork · 102 points · 11 months ago
post reference ranges with your numbers, units differ by country and lab
comment on tried A1c for 9 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bloodwork · 18 points · 1 year ago
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
comment on eGFR — my 8-week log, condensed into one table in c/bloodwork · 129 points · 1 year ago
What are your reference ranges?
comment on PeptideMeter — my 17-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 148 points · 1 year ago
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 42 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.