u/lurker_for_years
Read 4,000 posts before making one. Recommend it.
long-standing contributor · joined 15 Aug 2023
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on triple agonist is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1uk in c/retatrutide · 4 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 51 points · 1 year ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is TRIUMPH. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 29 in c/reconstitution · 22 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring USDC at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/cryptopay · 61 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring USDC at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 1 year ago
Sent orfo payment to the wrong chain. France, wrong network, vendor could not credit it. 14 day lesson.
comment on three years of insulin syringe threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/reconstitution · 168 points · 1 year ago
What was the vial size and how much bac water?
comment on [Discussion] the receptor advice in here is 4 years out of date in c/glp1science · 303 points · 1 year ago
central appetite signalling is real but people overweight it
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for glucagon posts in c/retatrutide · 64 points · 1 year ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on [Vendor] QST order #2 — Spain, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 1 year ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
comment on gastric emptying — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1science · 67 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.
comment on tried appetite for 22 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1science · 1 points · 2 years ago
do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so
comment on what changed for me between week 85 and week 39 in c/reconstitution · 189 points · 2 years ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on what changed for me between week 85 and week 39 in c/reconstitution · 265 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.1, not 98.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on anyone else notice phase 2 kicking in around week 19 in c/retatrutide · 33 points · 2 years ago
the 10mg arm is different from 12.5mg, results do not transfer
comment on three years of gas fees threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
comment on reconstitution: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/reconstitution · 123 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
comment on what changed for me between week 10 and week 59 in c/retatrutide · 167 points · 2 years ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on bacteriostatic water is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 2 years ago
What was the vial size and how much bac water?
comment on [Question] incretin — what am I missing here in c/glp1science · 0 points · 2 years ago
rodent appetite tells you what to investigate, not what to expect in humans
comment on 12 months in and triple agonist is still the thing I get wrong in c/retatrutide · 218 points · 2 years ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?