4.9k
[Lab] 6th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking retatrutide against ApoB for 3 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker…
u/matias_falk
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Hyderabad.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
7,080post karma
5,493comment karma
4submissions
57comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on anyone else notice resistance training kicking in around week 75 in c/glp1muscle · 101 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. DEXA is the standard.
comment on [Discussion] DEXA is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1muscle · 12 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 21. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether phase 2 is why in c/retatrutide · 105 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on DEXA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1muscle · -11 points · 1 year ago
lean mass retention is the 11 week conversation
comment on someone explain glucagon to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/retatrutide · 23 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on someone explain glucagon to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/retatrutide · 49 points · 1 year ago
the 1.7mg arm is different from 1.0mg, results do not transfer
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 0 points · 1 year ago
the 99.2% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 25 points · 1 year ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · 101 points · 1 year ago
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
comment on dose escalation: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 16 points · 1 year ago
the dosing is steep, the reflux reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 10mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 806 points · 1 year ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 11kg, and glucagon was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 1 year ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on test results — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 2 points · 1 year ago
Batch number? Date of test?
comment on [Lab] 5th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 569 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for glucagon posts in c/retatrutide · 769 points · 1 year ago
What was the dosing schedule in that arm?
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the the food-noise thing got better, not worse in c/labresults · 1 points · 2 years ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on [PSA] DEXA is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/glp1muscle · 6 points · 2 years ago
DEXA twice yearly is the pattern
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 23 points · 2 years ago
the dosing is steep, the constipation reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on test results vs Janoshik — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 155 points · 2 years ago
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?