u/rui_only_ro
Research use only means research use only. I post about handling, not humans.
member · joined 18 Dec 2024
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 145 points · 1 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 94 in c/scamalerts · 19 points · 1 months ago
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 94 in c/scamalerts · 27 points · 1 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 94 in c/scamalerts · 45 points · 1 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on rodent data in c/bpc157 · 6 points · 1 months ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on regulatory is the most under-discussed thing in c/meta in c/bpc157 · 10 points · 2 months ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 104 points · 2 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on 20 months in and A1c is still the thing I get wrong in c/t2dglp1 · 113 points · 2 months ago
post A1c with units and assay date
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify TB-500 in c/researchpeptides · 6 points · 2 months ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on [Meta] the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on phase 2 vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 35 points · 2 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 38. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on someone explain thymosin to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on someone explain thymosin to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/researchpeptides · 38 points · 3 months ago
regulatory status varies by country, check yours
comment on glycaemic control: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/t2dglp1 · 2 points · 3 months ago
no medication-stopping advice, ever
comment on [Vendor] QST order #2 — Canada, 17 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/researchpeptides · 59 points · 3 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on sequence — my 15-week log, condensed into one table in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 3 months ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on Germany: sequence, and what it actually costs here in c/bpc157 · 10 points · 3 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on reading exit scam threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 4 months ago
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
comment on [Lab] SSA reta — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/retatrutide · 25 points · 4 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify A1c in c/t2dglp1 · 7 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree. A1c matters as much as weight.