u/soren_nkemelu
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Genoa.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring purity at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 20 points · 3 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for reship posts in c/vendorvetting · 23 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, FGP took 11 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on week 91 check-in — 17kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/coa · 202 points · 3 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 21kg, and purity was the hard part in c/coa · 1 points · 3 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on certificate of analysis in c/coa · 1 points · 3 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about retatrutide until somebody posts a number in c/retatrutide · 271 points · 4 months ago
The heart rate signal in TRIUMPH is real and concerning. Higher doses had higher mean HR changes.
comment on week one is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1science in c/newbiequestions · 9 points · 4 months ago
Pens or research vials?
comment on stalled for 20 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 66 points · 5 months ago
Asked FGP for the batch-specific COA and they sent it within six hours, full document, batch number, date, everything. That is the baseline.
comment on 5 months in and Medutest is still the thing I get wrong in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 5 months ago
Not to be pedantic but testing and reship are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on stalled for 22 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 1 points · 6 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on stalled for 22 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 231 points · 6 months ago
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
comment on stalled for 22 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 96 points · 6 months ago
What were the related substances listed individually?
comment on what changed for me between week 30 and week 79 in c/retatrutide · 21 points · 6 months ago
Not convinced.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 72 weeks to accept.
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 39 in c/coa · 82 points · 7 months ago
Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side.
Disagree on that part. 97.2% and 97.4% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 4 points · 7 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on the COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/coa · 1 points · 7 months ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on the normal thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/newbiequestions · 52 points · 9 months ago
The injection was scarier than the basics itself. 9 seconds and I was shocked it was the easiest part.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 146 points · 9 months ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on is it normal to get fatigue at week 90 in c/retatrutide · 126 points · 9 months ago
the 1.7mg arm is different from 2.4mg, results do not transfer
comment on what changed for me between week 45 and week 88 in c/coa · 110 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.