u/soren_nkemelu
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Genoa.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on is it normal to get fatigue at week 90 in c/retatrutide · 126 points · 9 months ago
the 1.7mg arm is different from 2.4mg, results do not transfer
comment on what changed for me between week 45 and week 88 in c/coa · 110 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 2.4mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 37 points · 9 months ago
Crossposting this to c/sideeffects because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on genuine question about batch that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 1 points · 10 months ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on genuine question about batch that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 49 points · 10 months ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on does glucagon actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 704 points · 11 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about basics until somebody posts a number in c/newbiequestions · -28 points · 11 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with first time, not with what you concluded.
comment on [PSA] COA is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/coa · 338 points · 1 year ago
What were the related substances listed individually?
comment on stalled for 18 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/retatrutide · 484 points · 1 year ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on week 36 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 88 points · 1 year ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on tried phase 2 for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/retatrutide · 5 points · 1 year ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether phase 2 is why in c/retatrutide · 158 points · 1 year ago
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 155 points · 1 year ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
comment on week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 64 points · 1 year ago
comment on switched from 1.7mg to 1.0mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/coa · -38 points · 1 year ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on reship — my 22-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on someone explain glucagon to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/retatrutide · 8 points · 1 year ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on triple agonist — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/retatrutide · 168 points · 1 year ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on three years of triple agonist threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/retatrutide · 147 points · 1 year ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on three years of triple agonist threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/retatrutide · 438 points · 1 year ago
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 98.3% weight loss but the fatigue profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.