triple agonist — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on TRIUMPH in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with…
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?
triple agonism is TRIUMPH, do not generalise
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder