u/aksel_kjaer

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

chromatogram or it did not happen

integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own

Yeah, dual agonism does produce a different appetite profile than GLP-1 alone.

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

the small molecule is whether this actually works long-term

DEXA twice yearly is the pattern

DEXA twice yearly is the pattern

thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, secretagogue, long tail

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.

phase 13 data is interesting, phase 18 will tell the real story

Injection volume and flow rate? Those affect resolution.

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.