u/b12_baseline
Get baseline labs before you start. You cannot go back and get them later.
member · joined 6 Mar 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/dosinglogs · 8 points · 6 months ago
the people still updating at week 52 are the reward
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for Zepbound posts in c/tirzepatide · 68 points · 7 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on genuine question about Ozempic that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/semaglutide · 71 points · 7 months ago
week 52 and i am still not at maintenance, do not rush the ladder
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/tirzepatide · 27 points · 7 months ago
the muscle cramps from tirz is different, not necessarily worse
comment on [Lab] 24th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/hplc · 264 points · 8 months ago
comment on tracking: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/dosinglogs · -11 points · 8 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on 15 months in and purity is still the thing I get wrong in c/hplc · 73 points · 9 months ago
the gradient is doing the separation work, not the column alone
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about amylin in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 10 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on small win: titration stopped being a problem at week 41 in c/semaglutide · 4 points · 10 months ago
the 2.4mg dose is not the target, it is just what the pen goes up to
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 10mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 10 months ago
How long at each step before you escalated?
comment on LC-MS: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/hplc · 0 points · 10 months ago
instrument quality is less important than analyst consistency
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify SURPASS in c/tirzepatide · 294 points · 11 months ago
dual agonism is Mounjaro, do not generalise from semaglutide
comment on why does nobody talk about SURPASS in c/tirzepatide · 52 points · 11 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on anyone else notice SURMOUNT kicking in around week 20 in c/tirzepatide · -34 points · 11 months ago
the early fullness from tirz is different, not necessarily worse
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/semaglutide · 69 points · 1 year ago
titration speed is weekly dosing plus side effects, period
comment on switched from 0.5mg to 2.4mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/dosinglogs · 9 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in the Netherlands.
comment on [Question] Mounjaro — what am I missing here in c/tirzepatide · 11 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Question] Mounjaro — what am I missing here in c/tirzepatide · 67 points · 1 year ago
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
comment on the CagriSema question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cagrilintide · 2 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on the CagriSema question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cagrilintide · 51 points · 1 year ago
the co-agonism question is real and interesting