u/ines_boateng
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Odense.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on [Lane Report] Shanghai → UK, DHL, quoted 7 days, actual 9, cold pack solid in c/intlshipping · 19 points · 2 days ago
Actual days or estimated?
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Delay] two weeks in a transit hub, then delivered fine in c/intlshipping · 5 points · 2 days ago
the reship outcome is data worth posting
comment on [Lab] sequence check before price check. every time. in c/researchpeptides · 8 points · 4 days ago
thymosin fragments, GH secretagogues, TB-500, long tail
comment on [PSA] no tracking numbers. they identify both ends. removed on sight. in c/intlshipping · 42 points · 5 days ago
the community lane table lives here
comment on [Trial Data] STEP 1 vs SURMOUNT-1 side by side, with the caveats in c/trialwatch · 10 points · 5 days ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on [Stats] the placebo arm lost weight too. always ask by how much. in c/trialwatch · 28 points · 9 days ago
Is that absolute or relative risk reduction?
comment on intent-to-treat vs per-protocol explains half the arguments on this site in c/trialwatch · 10 points · 12 days ago
Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.
comment on [Data] packaging quality by vendor, scored on five things, 60 shipments in c/intlshipping · 1 points · 20 days ago
packaging quality matters on the 11-hour segments
comment on 10 months in and insulin resistance is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1women · 2 points · 22 days ago
contraception interaction claims need citation
comment on [Results] 47 weeks, 36kg, and SURPASS was the hard part in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 25 days ago
dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about EMS in c/intlshipping · 51 points · 28 days ago
Strongly agree. Customs adds unpredictable delay.
comment on [Meta] the research peptides rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/researchpeptides · 20 points · 1 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is secretagogue. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Meta] we crossed 800k members and nothing about the rules changes in c/meta · 1 points · 1 months ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on why does nobody talk about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 20 points · 1 months ago
the 23 week readout is different from the 40 week readout
comment on why does nobody talk about handling in c/researchpeptides · 3 points · 1 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with thymosin, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Meta] the endpoint rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/trialwatch · 2 points · 1 months ago
Is that absolute or relative risk reduction?
comment on [Discussion] appetite return is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/tapering · 12 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, regain is not a failure.
comment on [PSA] secretagogue is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/researchpeptides · 18 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Name it precisely.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 1 months ago
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
comment on switched from 15mg to 1.0mg and the nausea got better, not worse in c/intlshipping · 24 points · 1 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 59 weeks to accept.