u/injection_site_iris
Site rotation map on my fridge. Zero lumps in 14 months.
member · joined 27 Aug 2024
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 20 in c/glp1canada · 5 points · 1 year ago
Maintenance for 14 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
comment on someone explain moderation to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/meta · 63 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on does goal actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 43 points · 1 year ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 6 points · 1 year ago
the community is deliberately image-free
comment on [Discussion] the SURPASS advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 23 points · 1 year ago
the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for dual agonist posts in c/survodutide · 23 points · 1 year ago
the heart rate signal is real in the data
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 21kg, and province was the hard part in c/glp1canada · 76 points · 1 year ago
private plan details: redact your group number
comment on three years of SURMOUNT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 49 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for glucagon posts in c/retatrutide · 110 points · 1 year ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on [Vendor] QST order #2 — Spain, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 32 points · 1 year ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on [Discussion] rules is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/meta · 0 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the evidence standard works.
comment on [Discussion] the glucagon advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/retatrutide · 87 points · 2 years ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on [Discussion] the glucagon advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/retatrutide · 132 points · 2 years ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on 9 months in and SURMOUNT is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · 15 points · 2 years ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on hepatic fat in c/survodutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
rodent survodutide is investigation only
comment on tried retatrutide for 7 weeks. here is what happened. in c/retatrutide · 110 points · 2 years ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on what changed for me between week 10 and week 59 in c/retatrutide · 46 points · 2 years ago
Did you actually measure heart rate or is that a feeling?
comment on someone explain endpoint to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/trialwatch · 17 points · 2 years ago
What was the dropout rate?
comment on SELECT is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/trialwatch · 439 points · 2 years ago
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the endpoint endpoints
comment on [Discussion] dose escalation is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/retatrutide · 75 points · 2 years ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder