u/jonas_cardoso
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kuopio.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on [Lab] 23th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/glp1uk · 12 points · 11 months ago
NHS tier 3 is NHS, the waiting list is real
comment on [Lab] 23th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/glp1uk · -16 points · 11 months ago
private prescription routes vary by region
comment on stalled for 18 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 35 points · 1 year ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on [Lab] 24th independent test on FGP, and the trend is the interesting part in c/orforglipron · 2 points · 1 year ago
the the food-noise thing profile is speculative at this stage
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on import in c/customs · 69 points · 1 year ago
the 3mg import allowance is Canada-specific
comment on tried PeptideMeter for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 55 points · 1 year ago
WXT claimed 97.9%, PeptideMeter came back 94.2%. 5 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on insulin resistance in c/glp1women · 81 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on anyone else notice cycle kicking in around week 15 in c/glp1women · 305 points · 1 year ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on does below spec actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/labresults · 84 points · 1 year ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on stalled for 7 weeks at 12.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/t2dglp1 · 1 points · 1 year ago
A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin
comment on [Discussion] the ACHIEVE advice in here is 11 years out of date in c/orforglipron · 8 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on genuine question about ApoB that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 year ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on [Question] perimenopause — what am I missing here in c/glp1women · 43 points · 1 year ago
hair-loss on contraception is real
comment on [Results] 27 weeks, 36kg, and private prescription was the hard part in c/glp1uk · 7 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but pharmacy and MHRA are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 24 points · 1 year ago
the 93.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
Adding to this: Janoshik is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 95 points · 1 year ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on week 61 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bloodwork · 105 points · 1 year ago
eGFR noise during rapid loss is expected
comment on what changed for me between week 95 and week 49 in c/labresults · 5 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 3 weeks, not 25.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 91 weeks to accept.
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bloodwork · 491 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on A1c: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/t2dglp1 · 35 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.