u/milos_trevino
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 98 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/semaglutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on someone explain batch to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/labresults · 7 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on week 61 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bloodwork · 34 points · 1 year ago
ferritin from 21 to 29 is movement, not noise
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bloodwork · 128 points · 1 year ago
Same lab both times?
comment on [Discussion] the endpoint advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 42 points · 1 year ago
STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix
Adding to this: TRIUMPH is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · 10 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · 148 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on stalled for 8 weeks at 12.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/bloodwork · 145 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
comment on why does nobody talk about related substances in c/coa · -29 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about lipids in c/bloodwork · 104 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 25kg, and Medutest was the hard part in c/labresults · 44 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on test results — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 7 points · 1 year ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring USDC at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/cryptopay · 291 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 59 weeks to accept.
comment on why does nobody talk about lipids in c/bloodwork · 24 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.
comment on three years of SURMOUNT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/trialwatch · 22 points · 1 year ago
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
comment on area percent — my 20-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 86 points · 1 year ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on [Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 21 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 36. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on the baseline labs thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/bloodwork · 0 points · 1 year ago
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
comment on the baseline labs thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.