u/nabila_bakken
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on the A1c question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/bloodwork · 18 points · 4 months ago
Same lab both times?
comment on why does nobody talk about triple agonist in c/retatrutide · 121 points · 5 months ago
the dosing is steep, the early fullness reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for bloodwork posts in c/bloodwork · 14 points · 6 months ago
ALT is where the fatty-liver story shows up first
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 67 weeks to accept.
comment on [Question] ALT — what am I missing here in c/bloodwork · 11 points · 8 months ago
TSH from 24 to 19 is movement, not noise
comment on anyone else notice phase 2 kicking in around week 44 in c/retatrutide · 14 points · 8 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on the lipids thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/bloodwork · 20 points · 8 months ago
ferritin tanks quietly on a reduced appetite, check it
comment on [PSA] ALT is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/bloodwork · 42 points · 9 months ago
A1c moves slowly, quarterly is plenty
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Lab] SGN sema — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/bloodwork · 21 points · 11 months ago
triglycerides from 2 to 7 is movement, not noise
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether escrow is why in c/cryptopay · 110 points · 1 year ago
What was the gas and did it matter?
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bloodwork · 295 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether phase 2 is why in c/retatrutide · 116 points · 1 year ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 62 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/bloodwork · 123 points · 1 year ago
triglycerides from 11 to 7 is movement, not noise
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about chargeback in c/cryptopay · 8 points · 1 year ago
Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?
comment on small win: tapering stopped being a problem at week 30 in c/tapering · 47 points · 1 year ago
interval stretching versus dose reduction
comment on USDC — my 23-week log, condensed into one table in c/cryptopay · 126 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on stalled for 8 weeks at 12.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/bloodwork · 34 points · 1 year ago
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 2.4mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/bloodwork · 244 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on 23 months in and gas fees is still the thing I get wrong in c/cryptopay · 4 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 232 points · 1 year ago
Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.