u/employer_carveout
The carve-out is in the plan document, not the summary. Ask HR for the full document.
member · joined 3 Feb 2025
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on the identity question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/researchpeptides · 90 points · 6 months ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on anyone else notice bloodwork kicking in around week 75 in c/bloodwork · 21 points · 6 months ago
Baseline fasting insulin: 98.9. Week 86: 98.6. Same lab, fasted, same time of day. Trend matters.
comment on [Results] 52 weeks, 35kg, and bloodwork was the hard part in c/bloodwork · 51 points · 7 months ago
A1c moves slowly, quarterly is plenty
comment on someone explain bloodwork to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/bloodwork · 11 points · 9 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on the appetite thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/glp1science · 53 points · 9 months ago
rodent gastric emptying tells you what to investigate, not what to expect in humans
comment on tried gastric emptying for 14 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1science · 148 points · 10 months ago
mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about mechanism until somebody posts a number in c/glp1science · -27 points · 10 months ago
Which paper are you quoting?
comment on [Lab] SGN sema — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/bloodwork · 14 points · 11 months ago
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #17 — Germany, 9 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/glp1science · 26 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on does mechanism actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/glp1science · 3 points · 1 year ago
do not extrapolate rodent data to human dosing without saying so
comment on does mechanism actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/glp1science · 36 points · 1 year ago
Is that mechanism or speculation?
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify ALT in c/bloodwork · 25 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify ALT in c/bloodwork · 96 points · 1 year ago
Ferritin tanked from 10 to 9. Small appetite, reduced iron intake, nobody was testing it until I asked.
comment on why does nobody talk about biopsy in c/survodutide · 7 points · 1 year ago
not approved, descriptive posts only
comment on [Lab] 6th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 63 points · 1 year ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · -24 points · 1 year ago
the 5-letter analogs are speculative
comment on anyone else notice mechanism kicking in around week 70 in c/glp1science · 204 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on week 61 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bloodwork · 54 points · 1 year ago
A1c moves slowly, quarterly is plenty
comment on [Results] 66 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1science · 117 points · 1 year ago
Which paper are you quoting?
comment on triple agonist is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1uk in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 1 year ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions