u/endotoxin_ellie
LAL testing, sterility, and why "sterile filtered" is a sentence not a certificate.
long-standing contributor · micro · joined 28 Mar 2024
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on dose escalation: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 85 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on [Discussion] LC-MS is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/hplc · 209 points · 1 year ago
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
comment on triple agonist is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1uk in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with retatrutide, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify HPLC in c/hplc · 584 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Largest single impurity tells a different story than total purity.
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on pentadecapeptide in c/bpc157 · 12 points · 1 year ago
Australia here. Waited 11 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
comment on 7 months in and fertility is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1women · 83 points · 1 year ago
the cycle tracking data matters, keep it private
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for dual agonist posts in c/survodutide · -7 points · 1 year ago
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about lane in c/intlshipping · -10 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on BPC-157 — my 4-week log, condensed into one table in c/bpc157 · 155 points · 1 year ago
pentadecapeptide is pentadecapeptide, the supply chain naming is a mess
comment on chromatogram: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/hplc · 16 points · 1 year ago
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for glucagon posts in c/retatrutide · 35 points · 1 year ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on why does nobody talk about regulatory in c/bpc157 · 4 points · 1 year ago
regulatory status changed in 24 countries, check yours
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about gradient in c/hplc · 626 points · 1 year ago
axis labels included, always
comment on triple agonist — 22 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/retatrutide · 60 points · 2 years ago
Not to be pedantic but glucagon and triple agonist are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 44 points · 2 years ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 15 in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 2 years ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on lane: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/intlshipping · 1 points · 2 years ago
Australia to Australia: CPC with 20 days is the average, variance is 34
comment on reading MASH threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/survodutide · 0 points · 2 years ago
Not to be pedantic but survodutide and biopsy are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on pentadecapeptide in c/bpc157 · 9 points · 2 years ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 10 points · 2 years ago
Is that 98.4% area or mass?