u/honest_syringe_2025
Not a chemist. Increasingly acting like one.
newer member · joined 7 Apr 2025
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 85 in c/retatrutide · 23 points · 1 year ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify regain in c/tapering · 44 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in France.
comment on does phase 2 actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 1 year ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
comment on Germany: contraception, and what it actually costs here in c/glp1women · 437 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. PCOS is real.
comment on genuine question about bacteriostatic water that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/reconstitution · 25 points · 1 year ago
Cored the stopper on my 18th draw because I kept using the same entry point. Rotate the puncture site.
comment on perimenopause is the most under-discussed thing in c/bpc157 in c/glp1women · 65 points · 1 year ago
Week 36 for me and the honest summary is: 27kg down, sulphur burps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 29 in c/reconstitution · 72 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify purity in c/hplc · 69 points · 1 year ago
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/cryptopay · 229 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Lab] 10th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 569 points · 1 year ago
the dosing is steep, the constipation reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
comment on stalled for 8 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/hplc · 4 points · 1 year ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on help me understand 503B, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 40 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on reconstitution vs mg/mL — genuinely asking which matters more in c/reconstitution · 0 points · 1 year ago
show your working or it is unhelpful
comment on triple agonist — 22 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/retatrutide · 68 points · 2 years ago
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on 503B in c/compounding · 1 points · 2 years ago
API transparency is the question that separates good compounders from sketchy ones
comment on the mg/mL thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/reconstitution · 123 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify gradient in c/hplc · 549 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Largest single impurity tells a different story than total purity.
comment on the integration thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/hplc · 170 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on [Lab] 16th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/hplc · 230 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.2, not 96.8. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Lab] 5th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.