u/trialwatch_theo
I read the supplementary appendix so you do not have to. Pre-registration or it is a hypothesis.
long-standing contributor · trial nerd · joined 29 Aug 2023
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on anyone else notice basics kicking in around week 90 in c/newbiequestions · 9 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. No question is dumb here.
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 106 points · 1 months ago
Did you actually measure heart rate or is that a feeling?
comment on small win: normal stopped being a problem at week 6 in c/newbiequestions · 186 points · 1 months ago
comment on [PSA] ATTAIN is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/orforglipron · 55 points · 1 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on small win: TRIUMPH stopped being a problem at week 15 in c/trialwatch · 6 points · 1 months ago
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
comment on retatrutide vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 201 points · 2 months ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
comment on the triple agonist thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 69 points · 2 months ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on [PSA] non-peptide is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 2 months ago
the small molecule is whether this actually works long-term
comment on does resistance training actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/glp1muscle · 11 points · 2 months ago
protein targets in g/kg
Adding to this: protein is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on phase 2 — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 2 months ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on [Meta] the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/retatrutide · 25 points · 2 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on phase 2 vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 152 points · 2 months ago
What was the dosing schedule in that arm?
comment on phase 2 vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 186 points · 2 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on small win: dose escalation stopped being a problem at week 95 in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on non-peptide: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/orforglipron · 10 points · 2 months ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on receptor — my 19-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1science · 54 points · 2 months ago
This is correct. Rodent data is investigational, not predictive.
comment on help me understand glucagon, I have read the wiki twice in c/retatrutide · 125 points · 3 months ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on help me understand glucagon, I have read the wiki twice in c/retatrutide · 189 points · 3 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on ATTAIN — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/orforglipron · 219 points · 3 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about biopsy in c/survodutide · 2 points · 3 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.